The firm is currently offering vaginal mesh lawsuit evaluations to women who allege they sustained injuries from vaginal mesh implants.

The Rottenstein Law Group LLP, a New York-based law firm that represents hundreds of plaintiffs in transvaginal mesh lawsuits, acknowledges a study comparing the results of pelvic prolapse repair using vaginal mesh and native tissue.

The results of a prospective randomized trial, which were reported by Dr. Robert E. Gutman at the annual meeting of the Society of Gynecologic Surgeons, showed that cure rates and patient satisfaction following pelvic prolapse repair were similar at three-year follow-up regardless of whether vaginal mesh or native tissue was used for the repair, according to the May 9, 2013, article in Ob.Gyn.News that reported on the study.* That article further reports that, “subjects treated with mesh had more complications without experiencing benefit beyond that observed in the native tissue repair patients.”

Read full story at PRWeb.com: Rottenstein Law Group LLP Acknowledges Study That Raises Questions About Use of Vaginal Mesh For Prolapse Repair

Comments are closed.